I Hated Black And White Movies Movie reviews from a film ignoramus turned fanatic.
Review July 24, 2020

75% of silent movies have been lost, but we still have one found in a mental hospital

In my early twenties, the thought of watching a black-and-white film was already devastating, but watching a silent black-and-white film seemed like, well, it’ll be a cold day in hell before I do that. Turns out, with the apocalypse and everything around us, that might be the case.

I watched my first silent film only a couple of months ago, starting to see the world with a fresh perspective, realizing that the cultural heritage of classic movies is something I should not have ignored for three decades. It was the magnificent Metropolis. And yet I fell asleep. Not because it was bad – it was actually quite amazing – but I am unable to focus on such a film on my couch. I decided to watch everything in my local theater, and I was amazed by how well the overall composition of images and music worked out. Recently, I watched Carl Theodor Dreyer’s La Passion de Jeanne d’Arc (1928). It was only after the credits rolled that I realized this was a silent movie. It’s that good.

The second and last film role of Renée Jeanne Falconetti (being a stage actress) soon achieved iconic status.
The second and last film role of Renée Jeanne Falconetti (a stage actress) soon achieved iconic status.

Back in the day, when film as an art form was still a new kid in town, people objected to the introduction of the so-called talkies, which we now know as the dominant film form. Viktor Shklovsky, one of the leading Russian literary critics, stated that a talking film is as little needed as a singing book. Critics thought that the uniqueness of this new medium used clever directing, music, and expressive acting to tell the story. A talking movie was unnecessary – we already had the theater for that. You know how things turned out in the end.

It is considered that around 75% of silent movies have been lost. Finding such a treasure as The Passion of Joan of Arc is even more of a victory, considering the dreaded fate of its contemporaries. This particular film was considered lost for decades. In 1978, an almost complete print was found in the home of an Italian priest who used to screen that particular piece in mental hospitals. Yes, you read that right.

Dreyer’s film tells the well-known story of Joan of Arc. I think the story is not important here, but the investigation of human psychology is. I was amazed by the emotion itself: this film is a true embodiment of it. Joan of Arc was Renée Jeanne Falconetti’s last film role, and her performance soon achieved iconic status. Dreyer stated that he found in her “a country girl, very sincere, but also a woman of suffering”. In a move unheard of in the era of silent films, none of the actors wear any makeup. Dreyer wanted to emphasize the emotions showing on bare faces.

None of the actors wear makeup in the film, and everything is left to the power of expression.
None of the actors wear makeup in the film, and everything is left to the power of expression.

Ebert states that for Falconetti, the performance was an ordeal because Dreyer forced her to kneel painfully on stone to wipe all expression from her face – so that we as an audience could sense her inner pain. The power of emotion and amazing directing made this film scream even though it was silent. The scenes of Joan’s torture are rapid, and clerical judges and examiners are bombarding her with questions and accusations. The close-up of a prosecutor’s face changes from scene to scene, providing us with rapid dynamics and an overwhelming sense of confinement. We feel uneasy watching the interrogation since all of our senses feel attacked as well.

The dynamics and facial expressions seem so modern that the movie feels like a talkie.
The dynamics and facial expressions seem so modern that the movie feels like a talkie.

On its release, the film was almost immediately marked as a masterpiece. Dreyer’s use of close-ups and fast shots. On the set – as Welles did a decade later – he dug holes to achieve low angles used in this film. Low angles put us in the position of Joan of Arc, looking upon the priests deciding on her fate. Joan’s trial feels like our inquisition as well. The camera moves from judge to judge, and staring at Joan’s face, which is looking up at the sky – both appealing to God and looking at her accusers – is a sublime experience.

Carl Theodor Dreyer spent almost a year researching the story of Joan of Arc, and the script follows the transcripts of her real-life trial and death. The least we can do is to spend less than an hour and a half empathizing with another human being.


References

  • Bordwell, David (1981). The Films of Carl-Theodor Dreyer. University Presses of California, Columbia and Princeton.
  • Dreyer, Carl Theodor (1970). Four Screenplays. Bloomington & London: Indiana University Press.
  • Ebert, Roger (16 February 1997). The Passion of Joan of Arc (1928). rogerebert.com.
  • Kenez, Peter (2001). Cinema and Soviet Society from the Revolution to the Death of Stalin. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.
  • Slide, Anthony (2000). Nitrate Won’t Wait: A History of Film Preservation in the United States. McFarland & Co.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from I Hated Black And White Movies

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading